|
October 2005 • Vol. 1, No. 4
|
Advancing Orthotic and Prosthetic Care Through Knowledge
|

|
National Association for the Advancement of Orthotics and Prosthetics
1875 EYE STREET, N.W., 12th Floor
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006-5409
PHONE: 202-624-0064 • 800-622-6740
FAX: 202-785-1756
EMAIL: naaop@oandp.com
www.oandp.com/naaop
|
|
Congress is expected to work into the holiday season as
House and Senate committees consider major legislation
that could, in the end, impact orthotics and prosthetics.
The main political driving force behind legislation is looming
cuts in the Medicaid program, the federal/state program that
provides health care to low income Americans. However, also
driving the process is a scheduled cut in physician payments
under Medicare that, if not rectified by the end of the year,
would reduce payments to physicians by 4.5 percent in calendar
year 2006. Though this cut does not impact orthotists and
prosthetists, any Medicare bill that emerges from Congress
is going to have to pay for itself, implicating a whole host of
potential cuts to other Medicare providers. Despite this, the
controversial new Medicare drug benefit has been declared "off-limits"
by President Bush. To what extent O&P practitioners
are impacted by changes to Medicare this fall is unclear at this
point, but a host of changes are in the offing.
Any Medicare bill will most likely be attached to the
anticipated end-of-year Omnibus Appropriations spending
bill that will wrap up the first session of the 109th Congress in
November or December. This is because members will be hardpressed
to vote for cuts in Medicaid unless they are coupled
with the end-of-the-year spending package.
O&P practitioners are still smarting from a three-year fee
freeze enacted in the Medicare Modernization Act of 2003. The
cut, which is scheduled to run through 2006, is not likely to
be extended. The Chairman of the influential Senate Finance
Committee, Charles Grassley (R-IA), has stated that a Medicare
package will likely not contain fee schedule freezes for O&P
providers. But that assessment may be muted by the need for
Congress to fund ways to pay for other priorities, specifically
to offset an increase in physician payments. With the fiscal
climate very unfavorable to any new Medicare spending,
Congressional leaders will be looking at all provider payments,
and this includes O&P practitioners.
Another potential issue impacting the Medicare population
is the $1,500 per patient, per year cap on physical/speech therapy
and occupational therapy that are scheduled to be implemented
in 2006 if Congress does not act. The caps, which were initially
enacted in the Balanced Budget Act of 1997, have been subject
to a moratorium for much of the time since enactment with the
exception of a brief period in 2002. If implemented, the caps
have the potential to seriously impact people with disabilities
who need routine physical therapy or an intensive course of
therapy to rehabilitate an acute injury. But a long-term fix to this
problem is very expensive, potentially implicating additional
cuts to other Medicare providers.
Another potential provision under consideration is Medicare
beneficiaries' "direct access" to physical therapists without
physician referral. The latest draft of this proposal also has the
potential to directly impact O&P practitioners by potentially
allowing physical therapists to provide O&P services directly
to Medicare beneficiaries—without a physician's referral.
Though advocates for direct access have been unsuccessful
in enacting full direct access at the federal level, the Medicare
Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC) studied the issue
and issued a report in December 2004. The recommendations
did not endorse direct access; in fact, the Commission stated
that direct access could be detrimental. But despite MedPAC's
less-than-enthusiastic assessment of direct access, influential
leaders in Congress have pledged to work toward including a
direct access provision in the next Medicare bill.
Although O&P providers may not be directly targeted this
fall in the Medicare debate (at least at the time of this writing),
they must remain vigilant to ensure that no "surprises" occur in
November or December if a Medicare bill is enacted. NAAOP
will be monitoring developments closely and plans on actively
engaging Congress throughout this important time.
Written by Peter W. Thomas, Esq., NAAOP General Counsel and Dustin W.C. May, Legislative Director, Powers, Pyles, Sutter & Verville, P.C.
|
|