View Options
Print Options
E-Mail Options

Myoelectric Wiring Technique for Children and Young Adults

Mark Moseley, C.P.
Eric Baron, C.P.O.

Current advancements in electronic components have made it not only possible but increasingly desirable to fit myoelectrically controlled prostheses on young children with a congenital or acquired amputation of the upper extremity. A variety of electrically operated prosthetic hands may be considered for these children when the child has demonstrated readiness to accept an activated prosthesis; the child may be as young as two years of age. The cosmetic appearance of the prosthesis can be enhanced by the following technique incorporating a terminal device that will also provide excellent function.

Current myoelectric systems utilize a natural neuromuscular pattern for controlling grasp and release of objects by the terminal device. The flexor and extensor muscles of the remaining forearm act to deliver the required myoelectric signals for terminal device operation. This "biological" control is essential for the young child as no unnecessary learning of the control system is generally required.

An additional feature often overlooked in myoelectric prosthetic applications is the functional aspect of the cosmetic glove. Young children continue to utilize many gross motor activities in their daily lives that are often not facilitated by the hard smooth surface of a conventional type of prosthesis. Catching a ball, holding a large toy or climbing on playground equipment are just a few activities that children participate in which require gross motor skills and a friction surface, such as provided by a glove (Figure 1) .

The design and placement of the battery pack or power source for the myoelectric prosthesis is critical. The space available, the size or configuration, the location of the battery, and the weight distribution are all important considerations with myoelectric fittings in general, but especially important for the young child. The battery position should not in any way restrict regular activities that will be performed using the prosthesis. Careful thought and planning must be used, as this may be the single greatest challenge in providing a reasonable and useful result for the child and the family.

With the above mentioned points in mind, two versions of a technique dubbed "the wireless battery" are presented. When this technique is properly used, there are no exposed wires and the electrical connections from the battery to the hand are allowed to pivot freely without any twisting and eventual fatiguing of the wires (Figure 2) . The technique allows for reasonable weight distribution, and the battery location prevents any interference with functional activities (Figure 3) .

Wireless Battery #1

A clip receptacle battery holder (Otto Bock 13E52) is riveted to the humeral cuff (constructed of lmm thickness ortholen or equivalent) on the posterior portion at the mid-humeral level. The metal clip from the receptacle is removed from the plastic casing and the wire is allowed to pass through a small hole at the corresponding location on the cuff to the inside of the humeral cuff. The wire is then separated into positive and negative leads and soldered to stainless steel snaps set on the elbow axis where the humeral cuff will attach to the outer forearm of the prosthesis (Figure 4) . The positive and negative leads should lay flat along the inside of the humeral cuff. The entire inside of the cuff is then covered with moleskin, or something similar, to protect the wiring and provide a smooth, comfortable lining which will lay against the child's arm.

On the distal portion coming from the electrode/hand assembly, the positive and negative leads are also separated, leaving enough slack so the inner socket can be easily removed for servicing and/or maintenance. These two leads are each soldered to the corresponding snap which has been fastened to the proximal portion of the forearm (Figure 5) . The inside surface of each snap at this location should be covered with a piece of friction or plastic tape to protect against corrosion from moisture or perspiration. With the cuff snapped to the prosthesis and a charged battery properly placed in the clip receptacle, the proper electrical connection is now complete. The cuff should pivot freely about the snaps, and the connections should be secure enough to ensure that the function of the prosthesis is maintained throughout the child's wide variety of activities.

Wireless Battery #2

In this version of the "wireless battery" the ni-cad cells are removed from the battery casing (Otto Bock 757B8). They are then placed in a horizontal position on the posterior portion of the humeral cuff. Positive and negative leads need to be soldered to the battery cells and passed through the cuff to the snaps as in the previous version. The cells are then covered with leather or plastic which is fastened to the posterior portion of the humeral cuff. This ensures that the battery cells are protected against exposure and damage (Figure 6) . The wiring of the distal portion of the electrode/hand assembly is identical to the first version.

Since the battery portion in the wireless battery #2 is now no longer removable for proper recharging, an adaptation must be made to the battery charging unit (Otto Bock 757L11). The leads on the inside of the charger are disconnected from their original connections and soldered to additional male portions of snaps secured to each side of the charging unit. This allows for the battery pack/cuff to be removed from the prosthesis and snapped to the charging unit for proper recharging of the ni-cad cells (Figure 7) . Two battery/cuff assemblies should be provided so that proper function can be maintained at all times.

Conclusion

Experience has shown that the "wireless Mark battery" techniques offer a reliable electrical connection for myoelectric prosthetic fittings in cases where it is desired to locate the battery outside the forearm of the prosthesis. By decreasing the distal or terminal weight and maintaining excellent cosmesis, this technique improves the feasibility of myoelectric prosthetic applications for the young child (Figure 8) .


Mark Moseley, C.P., is an Associate Specialists at the UCLA Child Amputee Prosthetic Project, 1000 Veteran Avenue, Los Angeles, California 90024; (213) 825-5201.

Eric Baron, C.P.O., is an Associate Specialists at the UCLA Child Amputee Prosthetic Project, 1000 Veteran Avenue, Los Angeles, California 90024; (213) 825-5201.


 

Home > JPO > 1989 Vol. 1, Num. 1 > pp. 41-44

 

Copyright © American Academy of Orthotists & Prosthetists (AAOP)
All rights reserved. See disclaimer

oandp.com - Orthotics & Prosthetics Industry Information

Website built by oandp.com

oandp.com - Orthotics & Prosthetics Industry Information

Home About Education Legislation / Advocacy Project Quantum Leap Annual Meeting Membership Journal of Orthotics & Prosthetics Online Publications Bookstore Contact Us