American Academy of Orthotists & Prosthetists - Providing Better Care Through Knowledge
Online Learning Center

Search

 oandp.org  JPO
 Glossary


O&P Links

ABC
O&P Care
AOPA
NAAOP
NCOPE
ACA
OPAF
ACPOC

Home > JPO > 1991 Vol. 3, Num. 2 > pp. 84-89

View Options
Print Options
E-Mail Options

A Comparison of Shoe Inserts to Taping for Painful Arches

David 0. Draper, Ed.D., A.T.C.

Introduction

Most sports require some form of running. Whether this includes short sprints or continuous running, over a period of time this repeated stress may lead to arch pain (3). Injuries associated with painful medial arches include plantar fasciitis, abductor hallucis spasm and a stretched spring ligament (2).

In college and high school settings, often the first person to see an athlete with an arch injury is the athletic trainer. An athletic trainer's treatment regimen for arch injuries often includes cryotherapy, thermotherapy, administration of oral anti-inflammatory medication and taping techniques aimed at supporting the medial longitudinal arch (MLA). A mode of treatment frequently overlooked by athletic trainers is a foot orthosis. Arch taping has been a popular practice among athletic trainers for several years (1,8). Though the methods of application may differ, the claim is made that by running strips of tape from the metatarsal heads, around the calcaneus and back to the metatarsal heads, the longitudinal arch is reinforced. Until this study was performed, the only measure of the validity of this treatment was the athlete's subjective approval. If the athlete felt that the tape application supported the arch, the assumption was made that the treatment was sound. With the introduction of electrodynography (EDG) in the early 1980s, a method of measuring forces on the MLA was made possible. The purpose of this study was to compare arch taping and foot orthoses in their ability to support the MLA. This was assessed through EDG.

Literature

Several studies have been performed that compared tape application with other appliances. Gross et al. (4) found that a semirigid orthosis provided significantly greater limitations to ankle inversion (9 percent) and eversion (28 percent) than ankle taping. Studies performed by Rovere et al. (7) over a six year period, revealed that athletes who wore laced ankle stabilizers experienced half as many ankle sprains as athletes with taped ankles. Myburt et al. found taping to be more than twice as effective than braces in limiting ankle joint range of motion before and during a squash match (6). Hughes and Steets found no significant difference in retention of support when they compared pre-exercise and post-exercise measurements of ankle taping and semirigid supports (5).

More than 20 articles were reviewed that compared tape application with an external support. Though the findings among the studies may differ, each was similar in the respect that the studies compared ankle taping with an external ankle support. No literature was found that compared arch taping with any kind of external arch support.

Methods

The instrument used in this study was electrodynography (EDG). It was developed in the early 1980s as an aid to the healthcare professionals' treatment of foot ailments. It has been found to be a valuable diagnostic tool when measuring forces on the foot during ambulation. The EDG is made up of three components, a computer, a computer pack and electrodes (Figure 1) .

Typical use of the EDG involves the following four steps: 1) recording the subject's height and weight; (2) placing the electrodes on the subject's feet; (3) measuring the forces placed upon the subject's feet during ambulation; and (4) retrieving the data from the computer.

Eighteen individuals, ages 18 to 22, who were experiencing MLA pain served as subjects. Data regarding each subject's history of arch pain was collected. Seven electrodes were placed on the plantar aspect of each subject's feet in the following sites: (1) hallux; (2) first metatarsal head; (3) second metatarsal head; (4) fifth metatarsal head; (5) medial calcaneal tubercle; (6) lateral calcaneal tubercle; and (7) navicular tuberosity (Figure 2) .

With the electrodes in place, each subject underwent four experimental trials. During each of the four trials, the subject walked at a cadence of 100 steps per minute for about 20 meters, while the EDG measured forces applied to the seven areas under the electrodes. The four trials included the 20 meter walk: (1) while barefoot (Figure 3) ; (2) while wearing jogging shoes (Figure 4) ; (3) while wearing orthoses inserted into the jogging shoes (Figure 5) ; and (4) while wearing the MLA tape application in the jogging shoes (Figure 6) . After the trials were completed, each subject was asked to compare the arch taping and the orthoses with regard to comfort and support.

Results

The electrode that was placed on the navicular tuberosity was used to measure the amount of support that was given to the MLA. A high force reading in this area would indicate that the soft tissue structures under the arch were being lifted up against the navicular and supporting the arch. Analysis of variance statistics with a Scheffe technique revealed a significant difference, p>.OS between the arch taping and the orthosis. Although the tape application did provide a small amount of support to the arch, the orthosis provided significantly more support, and was judged superior (see Table 1 and Table 2 ).

Subjective assessment revealed that 17 of the 18 subjects (94 percent) felt that the orthosis was more comfortable, but that the tape application provided more support.

Discussion

The pre-fabricated orthosis used in this study was the "hawk" brand. It was composed of two layers of foam rubber, one dense and firm, the other soft, and it was covered with a cotton knit material. The insole was 1 cm thick and had a molded lift to support the MLA (Figure 7) .

The results of this investigation point to the orthosis as being an effective tool that athletic trainers can employ when treating MLA pain or injuries. The results of the subjective assessment might indicate that athletes confuse comfort and support, and feel that both cannot co-exist when support of the MLA is indicated. When the athlete steps off the table and puts pressure on the taped arch, the tightness and pressure are probably misinterpreted as support. Since there have been no previous studies performed on this topic, the investigator is of the opinion that athletic trainers tape arches because the athlete says it gives support. However, the results of this study indicate that arch taping is inferior to orthoses when support of the MLA is indicated.

It is important to note that because of the cost, the researcher did not fit the subjects with custom fabricated orthoses but instead used pre-fabricated soft orthoses. Custom fit orthoses, made from an impression of the patient's foot, are often used to support a painful MLA. The investigator recommends that future studies be directed toward comparing custom and pre-fabricated foot orthoses for the treatment of arch pain. Based upon this study, athletic trainers should include orthoses as part of their treatment of medial longitudinal arch injuries.

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank Mr. Larry Scire for his help with this study.


Dr. Draper is Assistant Professor and Undergraduate Program Director of Sports Medicine and Athletic Training at Illinois State University, Normal, Illinois 61761. He is also the Head Athletic Trainer at Illinois Wesleyan University, Bloomington, Illinois.

References:

  1. Arnheim DD. Modern principles of athletic training. St. Louis: Times Mirror/Mosby College Publishing, 1989:511.
  2. Brody DM. Running injuries. CIBA Clinical Symposia 1980; 32:2-36.
  3. Clement DB. A survey of overuse running injuries. The Physician and Sportsmedicine 1981 ;9:47-58.
  4. Gross MT, Bradshaw MK, Ventry LC, Weller KH. Comparison of support provided by ankle taping and semirigid orthosis. The Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy 1987;9:3336.
  5. Hughes LY, Stetts DM. A comparison of ankle taping and a semirigid support. The Physician and Sportsmedicine April 1983; 11:99-103.
  6. Myburgh KH, Vaughan CL, Isaacs SK. The effects of ankle guards and taping on joint motion before, during, and after a squash match. The American Journal of Sports Medicine 1984;12:441-446.
  7. Rovere GD, Clarke TI, Yates SC, Burley K. Retrospective comparison of taping and ankle stabilizers in preventing ankle injuries. The American Journal of Sports Medicine 1988; 16:228-232.
  8. Roy S, Irvin R. Sports medicine: prevention, evaluation, management, and rehabilitation. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc., 1983:440441.


 

Home > JPO > 1991 Vol. 3, Num. 2 > pp. 84-89

 

Copyright © American Academy of Orthotists & Prosthetists (AAOP)
All rights reserved. See disclaimer

oandp.com - Orthotics & Prosthetics Industry Information

Website built by oandp.com

oandp.com - Orthotics & Prosthetics Industry Information