American Academy of Orthotists & Prosthetists - Providing Better Care Through Knowledge
Online Learning Center

Search

 oandp.org  JPO
 Glossary


O&P Links

ABC
O&P Care
AOPA
NAAOP
NCOPE
ACA
OPAF
ACPOC

Home > JPO > 1991 Vol. 3, Num. 3 > pp. 145-146

View Options
Print Options
E-Mail Options

Technical Note: New Sterilization Procedures for Post Operative Socks

Martha Field, M.S.

Prosthetists and hospital rehabilitation teams often assist surgeons in selecting the optimal post operative dressing for a particular amputation. In some rigid dressing applications, acrylic/Lycra spandex socks are used (1,2,3). Since both acrylic and Lycra spandex are manufactured fibers with moderately low melting points, these socks must be sterilized in a gas autoclave rather than a steam autoclave.

Recent federal and accrediting organization regulations require hospitals to have sterilization procedures on file for every product they sterilize. This has caused a redefining of the standard sterilization procedures by the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (4). The new standard hospital procedures for gas autoclaving shorten aeration time considerably-from 24 hours to 12 hours at 120 degrees F (49 degrees C) in an aeration cabinet or eight hours at 140 degrees F (60 degrees C) in an aeration cabinet. Since sterilization is 105 minutes at 130 degrees F (54.4 degrees C), the prosthetist may now have socks properly sterilized within the 24hour scheduling period that is often required by hospitals, or even in a 12-hour period if requested. Sterilant mixture is 12 percent Ethylene oxide, 88 percent Dichlorodiflouromethane (Freon 12); sterilant concentration is 650 mg/l of chamber space; relative humidity, 60-100 percent; maximum pressure, 21 psi.

As well as adopting the new sterilization procedures, one manufacturer of post operative socks (9) has had the socks tested by an independent testing company (10) to determine whether or not the sterilization procedure really is effective on rolled socks and whether or not safe residual levels of the Ethylene oxide are achieved after the recommended aeration procedures. Both criteria tested positive. Resterilization is not recommended.

Just because written procedures are on file in the hospital's records does not always mean they are readily available to the hospital's staff on every workshift. This can force the prosthetist to handle a frustrated call from the staff. To alleviate this situation an insert card explaining the sterilization procedures will be placed in each sock bag, or the procedures will be printed on the bag itself. Currently, socks are packaged in polyethylene bags. The sterilization procedure recommends paper-to-film or tyvex-to-film pouches for sterilization. Hospital personnel and prosthetists were consulted on whether to change the polyethylene bag packaging. Both groups felt hospitals were more comfortable using their own supplies and that the polyethylene bags were sufficient to protect the socks until use.

Prosthetists need the assurance that their choice of post operative dressing is supported with products that meet patient needs and comply with current hospital sterilization practice. Many studies have been done evaluating the benefits of post operative fittings and recording new applications. A few of these have been cited (5,6,7,8). The new sterilization procedures for the socks used in these dressings have been defined by the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation, are standard hospital practice, are effective in sterilizing the rolled post operative acrylic/Lycra socks and will accompany the socks.


Martha Field, M.S. is the manager of research and development for Knit-Rite, Inc., Kansas City, Mo.

References:

  1. Burgess EM. Immediate post-surgical prosthetic fitting: a system of amputee management. Physical Therapy, February 1971; (51)2:139-43.
  2. Zettl JH. Immediate postsurgical prosthetic fitting: the role of the prosthetist, Physical Therapy, February 1971; (51)2:144-51.
  3. Sarmiento A, et al. Lower-extremity amputation. The impact of immediate postsurgical prosthetic fitting, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, January-February 1970; 68:22-31.
  4. Standard for automatic general purpose ethylene oxide sterilizers and ethylene oxide sterilant sources intended for use in healthcare facilities, draft version, Association for Advancement of Medical Instrumentation, Arlington, Va., EOST-D-8/85.
  5. Mooney V, Harvey JP, McBride E, Snelson R. Comparison of postoperative stump management: plaster vs. soft dressings, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, March 1971; 53:241-9.
  6. Nicholas GG, DeMuth, WE Jr. Evaluation of use of the rigid dressing in amputation of the lower extremity. Surgery, Gynecology & Obstetrics, September 1976; 143.3:398-400.
  7. Harrington J, et al. Use of a pylon for early ambulation after below-knee amputation; a preliminary report. Canadian Journal of Surgery, September 27, 1984; 5:500-2.
  8. Penzur MS, et al. Early post-surgical prosthetic limb fitting in dysvascular below-knee amputees with a pre-fabricated temporary limb. Orthopedics July 1, 1988;7:1051-3.
  9. Knit-Rite, Inc., Kansas City, Mo.
  10. Ethox Corp., Buffalo, N.Y.


 

Home > JPO > 1991 Vol. 3, Num. 3 > pp. 145-146

 

Copyright © American Academy of Orthotists & Prosthetists (AAOP)
All rights reserved. See disclaimer

oandp.com - Orthotics & Prosthetics Industry Information

Website built by oandp.com

oandp.com - Orthotics & Prosthetics Industry Information