American Academy of Orthotists & Prosthetists - Providing Better Care Through Knowledge
Online Learning Center

Search

 oandp.org  JPO
 Glossary


O&P Links

ABC
O&P Care
AOPA
NAAOP
NCOPE
ACA
OPAF
ACPOC

Home > JPO > 1992 Vol. 4, Num. 3 > pp. 151-156

View Options
Print Options
E-Mail Options

Orthomedics Fracture Bracing at LA County USC Medical Center

Mark A. Conry, CPO

Introduction

The concept of functional fracture bracing was initiated in 1963 by Dr. Augusto Sarmiento at the University of Miami. Since that time, the old standard philosophies of (1) immobilizing the bone and the joints above and below the fracture in casts or (2) open internal fixation have given way to using hydrostatic pressure of soft tissue to maintain length and alignment. Early joint mobilization and early guarded weightbearing have become accepted components in treating simple long bone fractures, minimizing such complications as joint stiffness and muscle atrophy.

Orthomedics has worked with Dr. Sarmiento at the Los Angeles County/University of Southern California (LAC/USC) Medical Center for the past 12 years, during which time the company has accumulated data on more than 3,500 tibia, 900 humeral, 700 ulna, 130 femoral, 220 Colles' and 230 both-bone forearm fractures.

Functional fracture bracing has evolved during that time. Fractures were first treated with plaster casts with hinged joint components, then with low-temperature thermoformable plastics (mainly Orthoplast). Today, most of these fractures are treated in prefabricated systems.

Indications and Contraindications

Clinical experience has allowed us to define definite indications and contraindications to using fracture bracing. Indications include:

  • diaphyseal fractures of the tibia, fibula, ulna (isolated), radius (isolated), humerus and distal one-third of the femur
  • a subsiding of initial pain and swelling
  • intact sensation
  • adequate reduction with acceptable alignment and minimal shortening Contraindications include:
  • intra-articular fractures
  • excessive pain or swelling
  • failure to maintain alignment of fracture
  • wound drainage (our rule of thumb is not more than can be absorbed by a single four-by-four in 24 hours)
  • spastic or insensate limbs
  • excessive shortening (more than 3/8 inch)

Clinical experience also shows that prefabricated systems are used 75 percent of the time for closed fractures treated within the first two to four weeks and 71 percent of the time in open fractures treated within four to six weeks. Prefabricated systems were not used if any soft tissue damage or superficial bony prominences existed.

Normally, when a prefabricated system is not applied, an Orthoplast brace is custom fit on the spot (see Figure 1 ). A cast was taken for a custom brace in only 9 percent of the closed fractures cases and in only 2 percent of the open fractures cases. The percentages of prefabricated braces in upper extremities are much greater (see Figure 2 ). (The small number of custom braces for open fractures in this study probably reflects the fact that the majority of these high-energy injuries were treated surgically.)

Additional Findings

The majority of fractures we braced were closed, with more rights than lefts in lower extremities and more lefts than rights in upper extremities (see Figure 3 and Figure 4 ).

For the population in this study, motor vehicle accidents were by far the largest cause of injury. Accidental falls were the second highest cause. Violent injuries, such as direct blows and gunshot wounds, are increasing (see Figure 5 and Figure 6 ).

The entire range of fracture types has been treated in braces, but the best results and quickest healing times are in low-energy injuries.

Transverse, oblique and spiral fractures are most common (see Figure 7 and Figure 8 ). In tibia fractures, most patients had injured the middle third (see Figure 9 and Figure 10 ).

Fracture braces tend to be worn for a longer time than casts even though healing times are comparable. Patients will voluntarily stay in the brace on a limited-use basis for several weeks after solid union is demonstrated on X-ray.

Generally, simple closed fractures heal more rapidly than do high-energy or open fractures (see Figure 11 ).

Conclusion

Our clinical experiences of the past 12 years show most types and levels of fractures can be managed with either prefabricated or Orthoplast braces if treated before peripheral callous forms.

We have continued to collect data on the type of bracing performed at LAC/USC Medical Center; and although follow-up results are not part of this study, the frequency of fracture types, treatment times, types of fractures braced and cause mechanisms should be of great interest to orthotic practitioners.


MARK A. CONRY, CPO, is a staff specialist with Orthomedics Inc., 2950 E. Imperial Highway, Brea, CA 92622; (714) 996-9500.


 

Home > JPO > 1992 Vol. 4, Num. 3 > pp. 151-156

 

Copyright © American Academy of Orthotists & Prosthetists (AAOP)
All rights reserved. See disclaimer

oandp.com - Orthotics & Prosthetics Industry Information

Website built by oandp.com

oandp.com - Orthotics & Prosthetics Industry Information