American Academy of Orthotists & Prosthetists - Providing Better Care Through Knowledge
Online Learning Center

Search

 oandp.org  JPO
 Glossary


O&P Links

ABC
O&P Care
AOPA
NAAOP
NCOPE
ACA
OPAF
ACPOC

Home > JPO > 1993 Vol. 5, Num. 3 > pp. 95-99

View Options
Print Options
E-Mail Options

The Syme Prosthesis Revisited

William Doyle, CP
Jerry Goldstone, MD
Dave Kramer, PT

ABSTRACT

Surgically successful Syme amputation. have often been followed by use of less successful prostheses. A unique design for medial-opening Syme prostheses has been developed to address issues of comfort, flexibility, strength, lightness and durability. Parallel goals of reducing fabrication complexity, and therefore time, as well as providing ease of adjustment were also achieved.

The design employs carbon graphite material in conjunction with a construction technique that is compatible with commonly used plastic fabrication methods. The procedure is designed to be readily adaptable to advances in materials technology. This article details the fabrication procedures for this medial-opening Syme prosthesis.

Key Words: SYME amputation, ankle amputation; below-knee prosthesis

Introduction

The Syme technique of amputation has existed since 1842 (1). Several excellent monographs have been written concerning the initiation of the technique and its subsequent development (1-5). Syme referred to his surgery as a disarticulation at the ankle affording ease of execution, less risk to life and a comfortable residual limb (2). "A successful Syme amputation ensures for the patient a mobility and independence not accorded to any patient with an amputation at a higher level" (3).

In spite of these advantages, surgeons have been reluctant to perform this operation. One cause for this hesitancy may have to do with the manufacture and use of the prostheses fitted afterward (6). These prostheses are often less than satisfactory, especially when compared to the dynamic potential known to exist in the Syme residual limb. Prosthetic results after a BK amputation, although not as spectacular, have been more predictable.

This article will describe a Syme prosthesis and fabrication method used in five prostheses. Patient activity levels varied from a bilateral moderate walker to a jogger and racquetball enthusiast. The participants reported the technique provided significant advantages. Attention was given to the needs of the prosthetist for a method that afforded not only economy of time and materials but also a simple technique compatible with a variety of prosthetic designs and configurations.

Background

The Syme procedure has several distinct prosthetic advantages over standard below-knee amputation levels:

Proprioception: The level of sensation is much closer to the ground than for the below-knee amputee. The tissue that is preserved is constructed by nature to bear weight and to deliver sensory feedback from walking (2).

Control: Since there is much more surface area and a longer lever arm, the amputee has considerably enhanced control of his/her movement (7).

Suspension: The typical Syme prosthesis is self-suspending. It does not need a strap or belt. As a result, there is little or no "pistoning" of the prosthesis during the transition from swing phase to stance phase. This is a significant advantage. It makes the prosthesis seem much more a part of the person while increasing his/her self-assurance and activity level.

Weightbearing Options: There are three choices of weightbearing configurations in the Syme prosthesis:

  • Distal: the preserved heel pad is used to bear body weight (8).
  • Proximal: the PTB characteristics of the upper socket bear body weight while unloading the distal surface (9,10).
  • Shared: various percentages of body weight are shared between the proximal and the distal socket areas to accommodate the patient's needs (8).

In spite of these prosthetic advantages, this very functional type of amputation surgery has waxed and waned in popularity for distinct surgical and prosthetic reasons.

Concerning Syme's surgical technique, Harris very strongly states: "No matter how many Syme's stumps may be examined to ascertain the results, the conclusions will be misleading unless the technique of the operation is known for each case. If the basic principles have been observed, and if the operation has been performed properly, the result is an assured success. If any of the fundamental principles have been disregarded, the result may be unsatisfactory, and it may not be possible to improve it" (2).

Primary among the prosthetic obstacles are: the intricate processes necessary to make the prosthesis, difficulty of fitting (often due to the above processes), frequent structural failures and poor cosmesis.

Several types of prostheses are fabricated for the Syme amputee, including (see Figure 1 ):

  1. Plastic prostheses with soft insert liners that provide suspension by means of compressible section in the prosthesis wall or in the insert itself (10,11).
  2. Plastic prostheses with a built-in air chamber and bladder. The latter expands upon entry and then rebounds to grip the residual limb and thus suspend the prosthesis (11,12).
  3. Leather sockets usually with eyelets and lacing to allow entry and then suspension when tightened. They have metal uprights or a plastic "half socket." Some are articulated (5,10).
  4. Plastic prostheses with medial-opening "windows" that provide a mode of entry and when closed provide suspension (9,10).
  5. Plastic prostheses with posterior removable sections, either a half-section hinged at the distal end or a window. These sections provide a means oof entry and when closed, suspend the prosthesis (8).

Method

The medial-opening Syme prosthesis was proposed for improvement. The goal was to construct a limb that incorporated comfort and flexibility; durability; lightness; ease of adjustment during the initial fitting and trial phases; a construction system compatible with the plastic prostheses techniques commonly in use; and a procedure that is adaptable and can accommodate further advances in materials technology (i.e., vacuum forming, Spectra® fibers or other new materials)1.

Considerations

The primary objective of most lower extremity prostheses is to restore mobility. Obviously, levels of mobility differ, ranging from the household ambulator to the far-ranging athlete. To achieve any of these functional levels, the prosthesis must first fit comfortably.

In addition, heat and perspiration must be considered. There is a long residuum that - for reasons of leverage - must be encased by the prosthetic socket. The leather-type prosthesis allows transpiration. The plastic type allows little or none. If an insulating insert or air chamber is added to the latter, the heat trapping effect is significantly increased. Therefore, the totally enclosing types of prostheses are not optimum in a warm climate or on a patient who perspires heavily or has poor hygienic habits (13).

Cosmesis is also important. Not much can be done about the poor similarity to the contralateral limb afforded by the bulbous--end Syme amputation. As a result, this factor must be considered before surgery. If cosmetic restoration is a primary concern to the patient, the Syme level may be ruled out (5,11).

Fabrication is the final consideration. Traditionally the Syme prosthesis has been made using complicated and heavy-duty construction techniques. For the socket, many layers of nylon, nyglass, glass stockinette, etc. are combined with other materials such as glass roving, Kevlar2, carbon fiber, etc. These are then impregnated with epoxy-, polyester-3 or acrylic-type resins. Frequently, the foot is given similar special treatment. As a result, the prosthesis often weighs more than desired and is complicated to make.

There is good reason for this heavyduty approach. In clinical practice, these prostheses can fracture due to the high activity level of the Syme amputee when compared to other amputees (see Figure 2 ) (14,15). As a result, prosthetists are concerned about the burden of momentary forces upon the walls of the Syme prosthesis and strengthen them accordingly.

There is a dilemma here. On one side, strength and durability are necessary and can add weight and bulk. On the other hand, the patient wants and often has a specific need for a minimal prosthesis that is light and cosmetic. The tubular Syme prostheses (no openings to cause weak areas) are considered the strongest. Unfortunately, the cosmetic result is often less than desirable due to the bulk of the chambers necessary to allow entry (12). When made lightweight, these too can buckle or fracture (8).

Description

In brief, the proposed prosthesis is a flexible, lightweight medial-opening-type Syme with a standard foot that is bolted and adhered to the socket. The flexible structure's integrity and strength are enhanced through the engineered use of carbon graphite fiber. The major thrust has been twofold:

  • To optimize fit and function through the application of new materials to achieve both strength and flexibility.
  • To reduce time and energy required in fabrication through simplifying design.

Technical Procedure

Take a plaster impression in the customary fashion, paying close attention to weightbearing design and any individual anomalies. At this time, stand the patient in the solidified plaster wrapping. Use spacers under the amputated limb to establish the correct height. With the patient standing comfortably, place anterior and lateral alignment lines on the exterior of the plaster wrapping.

Once modification of the positive model is completed, heat and form a Pe-lite end pad.3 This pad should extend up to the "equator" of the Syme bulb but not interfere with the distal edge of the planned window opening. Bevel the entire edge of the pad to provide a smooth transition on the inner surface of the socket. Now make a hemispherical spacer of Pe-lite designed to provide an adequate recess in the distal interior of the socket for the Kingsley Syme retaining nut.4 Plan the location of this spacer to accommodate the foot's alignment and placement (see Figure 3 ). Temporarily secure the spacer to the Pe-lite pad and then secure the pad to the positive model. Apply a PVA bag over the model, with end pad and spacer in place. Do not include the metal Syme nut.

Apply the material layers:

  • One 1/2-ounce Dacron with extra pieces as needed
  • Two nylon stockinettes with the ends sewn (reduces bulk)
  • A single layer of fiberglass wrapped in the proximal four inches and over the distal end
  • Two strips of 3/16-inch Pe-lite 1 1/4 inches wide. Taper (skive) these around their entire perimeters to a fine edge. The anterior strip continues from the proximal edge of the ball up to the tibial tubercle. The anterior vertical edge is kept approximately 1/4-inch away from the planned medial opening. The posterior Pe-lite strip is the same length as the anterior and starts at the posterior proximal edge of the ball. Warm these two lengths of Pe-lite and form them to the contours of the model.

Flatten a layer of 2-inch-wide unidirectional carbon fiber tape on a piece of paper.5 This carbon tape strip should be continuous and long enough to encircle the ball and incorporate the length of both Pe-lite strips (see Figure 4 ).

Glue the Pe-lite to the longitudinal center of the graphite using spray adhesive. Fold the parallel edges of the graphite over the upper surface of the Pe-lite strip. This will form the "Ibeam" configuration that optimally employs the enormous strength of the carbon fibers (15,16). Leave the center section of the graphite that will shroud the ball at its full width. Adhere all of these to the layers of nylon already on the model and in the places previously measured (see Figure 4 ).

Add: two more layers of nylon stockinette with the ends sewn, another layer of fiberglass top and bottom as in step three, one finishing nylon.

Using polyester resin mixed at 75 percent to 25 percent rigid to flexible proportion, laminate the above. Be sure to saturate all layers thoroughly. In our five prostheses, this resulted in a reasonably thin socket with good flexibility. It allowed torsion and yet was strong enough to absorb shock and tensile/compression stresses (15). It may, for some patients, be prudent to add more carbon fiber layers or substitute Kevlar stockinette for one or two layers of nylon. "The choice of materials to be used for socket fabrication depends entirely upon the patient's demands and requirement" (16).

Locate, design and cut out a medial window. Make a horizontal mark approximately '/8-inch above the "equator" of the bulb. Measure the circumference of the bulb. Wrap the measurement tape around the tibial shaft and proceed proximally until the same measurement is noted and mark the socket. At a level 1/2-inch proximal to the mark, make a definitive horizontal line for the proximal margin of the window.

Remember, the vertical tibial border of the window is 1/4-inch away from the edge of the carbon tape and parallel to it. The width of the cutout is equal to approximately one-fourth of the measured circumference of the bulb. If there are doubts about the opening design, use a check socket. Mark the posterior vertical limits of the window on the horizontal lines. With a straight edge, connect these two points and mark the anterior window border (9).

Look at the window thus designed to make sure it is cosmetically correct. Draw in radii at the four corners. These should be sufficiently large to be cut in one pass with an autopsy blade on a cast cutter. It has not been necessary to do a second lamination to finish the medial window. Forethought, accurate measurement and careful cutting of the window from the socket have been sufficient to make a clean opening. Place 1/8-inch padding on the inner surface of the window and close it with two one inch Velcro(r) straps.

Remove the plaster model from the socket. Trim the socket and window, and select the foot that is appropriate to your patient's needs. We have successfully used several types of feet, including the SAFE foot, Kingsley Syme SACH-both high heel & standard height-as well as standard SACH feet.6 Hollow out the keel section of the foot to approximate the measured height discrepancy of the patient.

Proceed with static alignment and when satisfied with the location of the foot, carefully mark it. Relocate the foot on the socket and mark the location for the attachment hole on the socket. If unsure of the alignment, try a test arrangement: Drill the smaller 3/8 inch hole and try the components on the patient again using a 3/8-inch bolt and thin standard nut to temporarily hold it all together. Then drill the larger hole for the Kingsley heavy-duty Syme nut. (The flange will rest on the inside of the socket in the recess created for it.) When properly done, this recess is slightly oversize in diameter (see Figure 3 ). Then, if foot adjustment is needed, the through hole can easily be enlarged to allow the nut to move in its recess.

Anecdotally, one of our patients wanted to be able to change back and forth between low- and high-heel shoes (boots). This was accomplished by fashioning a mandrel on the distal socket that fit into the Kingsley Syme SACH foot. Since the recesses in these feet are analogous, the mandrell maintains alignment. To exchange feet, he had only to unscrew the foot bolt.

To achieve dynamic alignment, the foot is bolted on with a piece of wet/dry sanding screen between foot and socket. In this way, alignment changes can be accomplished and maintained. When the optimum alignment has been achieved, mark the location and remove the sand screen. Bond the foot and socket together with a strong acrylic adhesive such as Seiglehartz® and replace the bolt.7 Be sure the socket surface is roughened and that neither surface is contaminated. Allow no voids to occur in this adhesive. If the foot-to-socket transition is less than ideal, fill and smooth the margins with a lightweight paste filler (e.g., 4110 & microspheres). Color this appropriately.

In our experience, the foot, attached to by this method, can be removed and replaced without destroying this socket.

Summary

We support the use of the Syme technique of amputation surgery when it is medically appropriate. Both the physical and prosthetic advantages are significant and can considerably enhance the quality of life for the amputee (16). To further encourage use of the technique we have tried to simplify the fabrication (i.e., a single-lamination); minimize the use of expensive materials; use standard resins and feet; eliminate extra steps (e.g., fabrication of sleeves or inserts, multiple laminations, foot/ankle modifications, etc.); make its components adjustable and replaceable; and make it light yet strong.



 

Home > JPO > 1993 Vol. 5, Num. 3 > pp. 95-99

 

Copyright © American Academy of Orthotists & Prosthetists (AAOP)
All rights reserved. See disclaimer

oandp.com - Orthotics & Prosthetics Industry Information

Website built by oandp.com

oandp.com - Orthotics & Prosthetics Industry Information