View Options - Click to expand
Print Options - Click to expand
E-Mail Options - Click to expand

Pediatric Rehabilitation in Children with Cerebral Palsy: General Management, Classification of Motor Disorders

J. G. Becher, MD, PhD

ABSTRACT

Cerebral palsy (CP) is the most common physical disability in childhood. The motor impairment syndrome is obligatory for the diagnosis, but a broad range of neurological deficits can be present as well. Professionals in pediatric rehabilitation are faced with a diversity of problems in the child and family (physical, psychological, communicative, and social), so a multidisciplinary approach for treatment is needed. The International Classification of Functioning offers a framework for team management in the treatment of children with CP. Based on this concept, an instrument for team conferences, the Children's Rehabilitation Activities Profile is described. This instrument can be used for systematic evaluation of the needs of the children and parents, the total development and evaluation of the goals of rehabilitation on the level of activities. In children with CP, three main kinds of motor disorders are seen: spastic paresis; ataxic paresis, and dyskinetic paresis. In the most common disorder, spastic paresis, many different impairments of muscle function are described. Spasticity is only one of the components of a spastic paresis. The clinical consequences of these differences are discussed. In children with walking ability, the walking pattern is related to the functional prognosis of ambulation at adulthood. A classification of walking patterns is presented that can be used as a framework for treatment programs.

Keywords: Rehabilitation, therapy, management, cerebral palsy, spasticity, gait analysis, team management

Cerebral palsy (CP) is an umbrella term covering a group of nonprogressive--but, in time, often changing--motor impairment syndromes secondary to lesions or anomalies of the immature brain.1 Onset usually occurs before the first birthday. CP is the most common physical disability in childhood; the incidence was stabilized in the nineties at around 2-2.5 per 1000 live births.2

Although the motor disorder is the most striking symptom, many other pediatric and neurological impairments are associated with CP, such as failure to thrive caused by feeding problems or constipation, seizures, visual and auditory impairments, mental retardation, speech impairments, such learning deficits as dyslexia and nonverbal learning disability, and behavioral impairments.

GENERAL MANAGEMENT

Treatment of children with CP requires a long-term process during growth by a multidisciplinary team, focusing on all developmental aspects of the child and planning interventions in relation to the most urgent needs of the child and the family. The long-term goal is the optimal functioning in adulthood.3 The organization of the health care for children with CP is very heterogeneous within and among countries. Recently, minimal acceptable standards have been described.4 Pediatricians, pediatric orthopaedic surgeons, pediatric neurologists, and, rather uniquely in the Netherlands, pediatric physiatrists are involved in the multidisciplinary treatment of children with CP. The International Classification of Functioning (ICF) model (most recent version of the International Classification of Impairment Disability and Handicap, WHO, Geneva, 1999) offers a framework for a multidisciplinary, need-oriented team approach (Figure 1 ). Based on this model, the Rehabilitation Activities Profile for children (Children's RAP) has been developed (Figure 2 ).5 This is an instrument for team communication on the level of abilities and so avoids the use of jargon. The goals of treatment also require description of the level of abilities. Long-term (e.g., the child will walk independently without walking aids, following education in a primary school) and short-term goals (e.g., the child can sit on a chair for 60 seconds without support) need to be described in a measurable way. In this way, evaluation of the goals in the team conferences is possible, and the results of treatment are clear for all team members as well as for the parents.6

MEDICAL MANAGEMENT

Prognosis of movement abilities can be made in the second to third year of life and is strongly related to the kind and localization of the motor disorder and the mental status of the child. There are three main types of motor syndromes: spastic paresis, ataxic paresis, and dyskinetic paresis.

Spastic paresis is characterized by a posture- and movement-dependent tone regulation disorder. The clinical symptoms are the loss or absence of tone in lying, and increase in tone in sitting, standing, walking, or running, depending on the degree of involvement. Spastic paresis is the most common motor disorder (83%).2

In patients with ataxic paresis, impairments of equilibrium and coordination are dominant. There are hypermetric movements in the extremities, and tremor and titubations can be present. Only 4% of children with CP have a mainly ataxic paresis, often with some signs of spasticity in the legs. The time course of obtaining walking ability is delayed in comparison with spastic paresis, but most children achieve walking ability, at least with a walking aid.

Dyskinetic paresis can be divided into the hyperkinetic (athetoid) type, characterized by involuntary movements, most pronounced in the face and extremities, which are present even at rest, and the dystonic type, characterized by slow powerful contractions of agonist and antagonist of movement simultaneous, locally or with total body involvement. In time, a hyperkinetic type of movement can change into a dystonic type, and combinations are also possible. The development of head and trunk balance is delayed. Some children achieve walking ability even at the age of 10 years. Dyskinetic paresis is seen in 12% of children with CP.

For the proper treatment of children with CP, the classification of the kind of motor disorder is crucial. The surgical and orthotic management in children with dyskinetic or ataxic paresis is completely different from that of children with spastic paresis. Because the spastic paresis is the most common motor syndrome, this article will focus on that motor disorder.

The motor disorder can also be classified in regard to the localization: hemiplegia is defined as a unilateral involvement (33%); diplegia as a bilateral involvement, in which only the lower extremities are involved or the lower extremities are more involved than the upper extremities (44%); quadriplegia (or tetraplegia) is defined as a bilateral involvement, in which the upper extremities are equal or more involved than the lower extremities (6%). This classification is unambiguous and easy to use in clinical practice. [Classifications using the presence of muscle impairment of the upper extremities (paraparesis if no involvement of the upper extremities, diplegia with involvement of the upper extremities) or bulbar involvement (diplegia without bulbar involvement, quadriplegia with bulbar involvement) can cause confusion. These signs can be present only slightly, so it is difficult in clinical practice to set limits for the classification paraparesis, diplegia, and quadriplegia.] According to this classification, the functional prognosis of independent walking ability (with or without walking aids) can be set: 100% of the hemiplegic children, 85% of the diplegic children, based on the ability to put weight on the hands while prone at 18 months and a short sit at the age of 24 months,7 and none of the quadriplegic children will achieve independent walking ability in adulthood.8,9 The Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) is an instrument for early classification the severity of the motor disorder.10

CLASSIFICATION OF IMPAIRMENT IN MUSCLE FUNCTION IN SPASTIC PARESIS

About 80-90% of the children have spastic paresis as the motor disorder. However, with regard to the impairment of muscle function, a variety of clinical symptoms can be distinguished. Several terms have been used in the literature to describe the different symptoms of spastic paresis, and the same terms are often defined differently.11 The term "spasticity" is often used for all kinds of motor disorders or for all signs of a spastic paresis. Because a proper description of the different symptoms is needed for selection of patients for a specific therapy, conventions about terminology are needed. The following classification is according to the actual insight.

In spastic paresis, three sets of symptoms can be distinguished: impairment of muscle activation; impairment of muscle stiffness; and impairment of muscle length.

IMPAIRMENT OF MUSCLE ACTIVATION

Impairment of muscle activation can be divided into deficit symptoms and excess symptoms.

Deficit symptoms are caused by the reduction of voluntary muscle function. In the case of mild involvement, only loss of dexterity of movement, diminished ability to perform fast alternating movements and enhanced fatigability are present. In more severe involvement, the patient can perform only synergistic voluntary movements and the level of force is reduced. The lowest level of motor control is voluntary movement in a general flexion (mostly present in the upper limbs) or extension pattern (mostly present in the lower limbs). Synergistic voluntary movements are also described as "loss of selective motor control." In spastic paresis, the influence of posture is also increased. For instance, it is much easier for most patients to bend the hip in a sitting position than in a standing position. For that reason, it is not rational to use the Medical Research Council scale for grading the force of muscles when synergies of muscle movements are present.

Excess symptoms reflect the presence of abnormal muscle activity. Clinically, the presence of abnormal muscle activity can be noticed either during passive joint movements, while the patient is in maximal relaxation, or while the patient is performing motor tasks.

Passive Movement

During (very) slow passive movements, muscle tone can be examined. Some patients show a raised muscle tone during a very slow passive stretch (hypertonia defined as a non-velocity-dependent resistance to passive stretch). This increased resistance could be caused by a continuous activation of the stretched muscle (tonic stretch reflex activity).

During fast passive movements, the presence of spasticity, defined as the velocity-dependent resistance to passive stretch, can be examined. If only a catch (clasp-knife symptom) can be noticed, the spasticity is mild. In more severe spasticity, a clonus in the muscle or a marked increase in resistance can be evoked.12 Hyperreflexia of tendon jerks, abnormal cutaneo-muscular reflexes (such as Babinski's response) are also excess symptoms.

When performing motor tasks, three other features of involuntary muscle activation can be present: mirror movements can be present in patients with a hemiplegia or asymmetric diplegia: strong voluntary contraction of a muscle on the unaffected side evokes contractions in the same muscle on the opposite side; involuntary synergies can arise during the performance of a motor task. For example, the occurrence of a flexor synergy in the arm of hemiplegic patients when walking; postural reflexes cause involuntary muscle activity during the performance of a motor task (e.g., the clawing of the toes when walking). The muscle contractions develop gradually during walking.

Active (Voluntary) Movement

During active movement, co-contraction of the antagonist is also an excess symptom. Clinically, co-contraction can sometimes be observed as a paradoxical movement. For instance, the patient is asked to extend the elbow, but a flexion movement takes place: the co-contraction of the flexors is more powerful than the contraction of the extensors of the elbow. There is no relationship between the presence of co-contraction during voluntary movement and spasticity during passive movement.13 The amount of co-contraction in repetitive movements of the ankle is significantly lower on the hemiplegic side than on the unaffected side.14

IMPAIRMENT OF MUSCLE STIFFNESS

Clinically, increased muscle stiffness (defined as hypertonia) can be observed during slow passive stretch of a muscle after maximal relaxation. It is important to choose a posture for the patient in which maximal relaxation can be achieved (i.e., lying supine, flexion-abduction-exorotation in the hip and flexion in the knee will relax the triceps surae muscle). Without electromyographic activity, hypertonia can be caused by changes in the biomechanical properties of the muscle.

IMPAIRMENT OF MUSCLE LENGTH

The development of muscle shortening is a well-known phenomenon in clinical practice. It is unclear why muscle shortening is present in some patients and not in others. A neurological growth disturbance has been postulated.15 Because muscle shortening takes place in the pattern of movement, a relation between gait pattern and muscle shortening seems probable.

The classification of impairment of muscle function in spastic paresis is summarized in (Table 1 ). The clinical consequences of this classification are evident: treatment of spasticity can improve only functional problems caused by spasticity, not by other such impairments as postural reflexes, hypertonia, or muscle shortening. This is crucial, for instance, for selection of patients for a specific therapy, such as prescription of ankle foot orthoses or selective dorsal rhizotomy.

CLASSIFICATION OF GAIT PATTERN

In children with CP, the classification of gait pattern can be used to determine developmental risks, to forecast walking ability in time, and to define therapeutic measures, such as orthotic treatment or surgery. For hemiplegic patients, four kinds of gait patterns are recognized.16 The following classification can be used for both hemiplegic and diplegic patients. Diplegic patients can show different patterns for each leg.

Type 1: Insufficient Foot Lift in Swing

In children affected only mildly, the main problem in walking is insufficient foot lift in mid-swing and forefoot landing at initial contact. In general, insufficient activity in the tibialis anterior and/or shortening of the gastrocnemius muscle is the cause of this gait pattern.

Type 2: Knee (Hyper)Extension in Midstance without Heel Rise

More severely affected children show, besides the insufficient foot lift in mid-swing, knee extension or hyperextension after initial contact instead of knee flexion, without heel rise in midstance. This is caused by a premature activation of the triceps surae muscle. The forefoot landing may be caused not only by insufficient foot lift but also by incomplete knee extension in terminal swing due to insufficient selective motor control (in terminal swing, hip flexion must be combined with a knee extension movement (Figure 3 ).

Type 3: Knee (Hyper)Extension in Midstance with Heel Rise

This gait pattern is similar to type 2, but heel rise takes place in midstance (Figure 4 ). A higher degree of abnormal activation of the triceps surae muscle is present. Prolonged activation of the vastus lateralis muscle can be present as a sign of insufficient power of the gastrocnemius muscle in terminal stance. In that case, the risk of development of a gait type 4 is present.

Type 4: Knee Flexion in Midstance with Heel Rise

In severely affected children, a gait pattern characterized by hip and knee flexion in midstance can be present. This gait pattern can be caused by strong abnormal activity (with or without muscle shortening) of the gastrocnemius and hamstring muscles or by abnormal activity of the psoas and hamstring muscles (Figure 5 ). The former situation has a better functional prognosis than the latter. These children are at high risk of developing shortening of the psoas, hamstring, and gastrocnemius muscles, and, in later stages, flexion contractures in hip and knee joints. Because this gait pattern is very energy-consuming, deterioration in (pre)puberty can be expected.

Type 5: Knee Flexion in Midstance without Heel Rise

The worst pattern of gait is a gait pattern with flexion of the hip and knee in midstance without heel rise. Insufficient power of the gastrocnemius muscle must be present. Often, it is caused by previous gastrocnemius surgery or Achilles tendon lengthening, but it can also develop spontaneously (Figure 6 ). If a change of gait pattern in bilateral involvement, at least into type 4 gait pattern, cannot be reached, loss of walking ability can be expected in puberty.

Besides these gait patterns, foot deformation can be present (varus or valgus) (Figure 6 ). Increased homolateral trunk movements or pelvic drop of the contralateral leg in midstance are signs of weakness of the hip abductors (Figure 3 ). Also, endorotation adduction motion in terminal swing can be present, in severe cases resulting in rubbing of the knees (Figure 5 ). This can be caused by shortening or abnormal activity of the medial hamstrings. Persistent adduction in stance and swing can be caused by shortened hip adductors, endorotation by increased hip anteversion and endorotation contractures. Exorotational or endorotational foot progression angles can be caused by hip rotational contractures or rotational deformities of the femur or tibia. Insufficient foot clearance in preswing can be related to insufficient hip and knee flexion or abnormal stretch reflex activity (and shortening) of the rectus femoris muscle.17

All these aspects of the gait pattern must be taken into account for making a plan for improvement of gait. The task of the medical specialist is to coordinate the multidisciplinary treatment of children with CP. Setting long-term goals on the level of abilities is the major task of the team. The medical specialist must determine the functional possibilities of the child and the risks for deterioration during growth. The medical treatment should take place within a whole treatment program, taking into account all aspects of development of the child and the possibilities of its environment. It is a challenging task for teams specializing in the treatment of children with CP.

CONCLUSION

In children with CP, a complex of neurological impairments and developmental risks with regard to their physical, psychological, and social development can be present. Pediatric rehabilitation is a complex process, facing all these problems. First, the diagnosis and functional prognosis of the child with regard to movement abilities, cognition, and communication must be determined. A multidisciplinary treatment approach is needed. A tool for team conferences, based on the model of the ICF, is presented. Because the motor impairment is the main interest of medical treatment, classification of the motor syndromes and impairment of muscle functions are described. Finally, a classification of gait patterns in relation to the degree of involvement for patients with a spastic paresis is described. This classification can be used to set the prognosis of ambulation and the kind of interventions needed to optimize the walking ability.


J. G. BECHER, MD, PhD, is affiliated with the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine of the VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Copyright © 2002 American Academy of Orthotists and Prosthetists.Correspondence to: J. G. Becher, MD, PhD, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, VU University Medical Centre, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands; E-mail: jg.becher@vumc.nl

References:

  1. Mutch L, Alberman E, Hagberg B, Kodama K, Perat MV. Cerebral palsy epidemiology: where are we now and where are we going? Dev Med Child Neurol. 1992;34:547-551.
  2. Hagberg B, Hagberg G, Beckung E, Uvebrant P. Changing panorama of cerebral palsy in Sweden. VIII. Prevalence and origin in the birth year period 1991-94. Acta Paediatr. 2001;90:271-277.
  3. van der Dussen DL, Nieuwstraten W, Roebroeck M, Stam HJ. Functional level of young adults with cerebral palsy. Clin Rehabil. 2001;15:84-91.
  4. Bakheit AM, Bower E, Cosgrove A, Fox M, Morton R, Phillips S, Scrutton D, Shrubb V, Yude C. Opinion statement on the minimal acceptable standards of healthcare in cerebral palsy. Disabil Rehabil. 2001;23:578-582.
  5. Roelofsen EE, Lankhorst GJ, Bouter LM. Simultaneous development and implementation of the children's rehabilitation activities profile: a communication instrument for pediatric rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2001;23:614-622.
  6. Roelofsen EE, Lankhorst GJ, Bouter LM. Team conferences in paediatric rehabilitation: organization, satisfaction and aspects eligible for improvement. Int J Rehabil Res. 2000;23:227-232.
  7. Fedrizzi E, Facchin P, Marzaroli M, Pagliano E, Botteon G, Percivalle L, Fazzi E. Predictors of independent walking in children with spastic diplegia. J Child Neurol. 2000;15:228-234.
  8. Edebol-Tysk K, Hagberg B, Hagberg G. Epidemiology of spastic tetraplegic cerebral palsy in Sweden. II. Prevalence, birth data and origin. Neuropediatrics. 1989;20:46-52.
  9. Sala DA, Grant AD. Prognosis for ambulation in cerebral palsy. Develop Med Child Neurol. 1995;37:1020-1026.
  10. Palisano RJ, Hanna S, Rosenbaum PL, Russell DJ, Walter SD, Wood EP, Raina PS, Galuppi BE. Validation of a model of gross motor function for children with cerebral palsy. Phys. Ther. 2000;80:974-985.
  11. Fontenrose A, Miller J, Hallum A. Physician's and physical therapist's evaluations of cerebral palsied children for Achilles tendon lengthening. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1984;26:208-214.
  12. Lance JW. What is spasticity [letter]? Lancet. 1990;335:606.
  13. Dietz V, Berger W. Cerebral palsy and muscle transformation. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1995;37:180-184.
  14. Becher JG, Harlaar J, Lankhorst GJ, Vogelaar TW. Measurement of impaired muscle function of the gastrocnemius, soleus, and tibialis anterior muscles in spastic hemiplegia: a preliminary study. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1998;35:314-326.
  15. Ziv I, Blackburn RMKJ. Muscle growth in normal and spastic mice. Dev. Med Child Neurol. 1984;26:94.
  16. Gage JR. Gait analysis. An essential tool in the treatment of cerebral palsy. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1993;00:126-134.
  17. Gage JR, Novacheck TF. An update on the treatment of gait problems in cerebral palsy. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2001;10:265-274.