Stephen Mandacina, CP, FAAOP Hanger Prosthetics & Orthotics Kansas City, Missouri
Not only are children fit with myoelectric arms at a much earlier age than years before,
but also they are now much more functional and successful with these devices. Advancements
such as microprocessor-based controls, longer lasting batteries, improved socket design, and
flexible socket materials have improved the functionality of children with their prosthesis,
especially children under the age of 5. These advances and can provide a greater functionality
with the prosthesis compared to results of devices from just a few years ago.
Our organization has found an increasing acceptance of myoelectric control for this
young population, primarily from the results received in improved socket design and
components. However, the three most important criteria for functionality at this age comes from
1) a team approach, 2) continual follow up, and 3) discussions with the parents, Certified
Prosthetists, PM&R Physician, Occupational Therapists, manufacturers, and other referrals such
as Case Managers.
The most critical factor in any prosthesis is the socket. The socket
must be comfortable, easy to don, provide adequate suspension with
maximum ROM, and allow functional control of the terminal device. If
there is any concern regarding function of a prosthesis, a full assessment of
the socket fit must be performed. An easy guideline is an anatomical
shaped flexible socket that doesn’t allow for limb movement within the
socket. Any true functional assessment must take into consideration that
the child is wearing an appropriate device for the specified activity. The
anatomically designed socket is not only heat moldable to accommodate
for growth, but also made of plastics which are flexible allowing for an
increased functional ROM with terminal device
control. The socket must be anatomically correct and
growth adjustable. |
 |
Flexible inner socket
providing growth
allowance, suspension
and ROM. |
 |
In recent years, the microprocessors controlling the terminal device
have drastically improved, providing optimum control by the child. Not
only can the gains be adjusted, but also thresholds, rate of contraction, and
strategy of control. All adjustments are visually friendly on a computer or
hand held PDA. Many of these devices record usage of the prosthesis,
giving the rehab team and payers knowledge of the child’s
incorporation of the device in their daily activities. |
Adjustments to electric devices
are not preformed on a
computer or hand-held PDA. |
Our team of specialized clinicians have found an increase in functionality with children
of very young age with myoelectrics using devices such as VASI’s SPM circuit that uses a
standard computer to communicate with the prosthesis, and Animated Prosthetics Inc, which
uses a wireless link with a PDA to perform similar communications, or OttoBock’s coding plug
setup, which uses color specified plugs to change the strategy of control.
Batteries have drastically advanced in the past few years. Unlike batteries of the past, it
is recommended to attach the battery inside the prosthesis, and not clipped
to the child’s clothing. This can be done because the batteries are now
much smaller and lighter. Like adults, the Li-Ion cell is used more
frequently giving a longer wear time and a quicker charge time. Because
of this, only one battery is necessary for a couple days worth of operation,
so the battery can be placed internally. This protects the battery as well as
prevents misplacing the battery or the hassle of interchanging batteries.
Recently, technology is progressing toward a lithium polymer cell. This
is a very small, lightweight battery, drastically decreasing the weight of
the prosthesis, which allows smaller and younger children the ability to
wear and operate electric systems.
 |
 |
 |
New Lithium Polymer
battery. |
Smaller electrodes don’t
take up much room making
the arm more cosmetic. |
Thin preamplifier with gain
adjustment. |
The most widely used input device for children are electrodes. The standard Otto Bock
style works well, but takes up considerable amount of length on the limb. Oftentimes, for
children with short Radial level deficiencies under 2 years old, this
electrode may not be the best option. The remote electrode preamp
style works well in these situations. The electrode doesn’t take up
much space on the limb, and is flat on the exterior of the socket so no
bulge appears in the lamination. Also
what is nice about this style is if the
EMG site changes, it is very easy to
move the electrode. Or, when changing
to a dual site, a new socket is not
necessary to just add the 2nd electrode,
therefore decreasing the cost to the payer. Similar to the Otto
Bock style, a gain adjustment is on the back of the preamplifier.
Also remember this adjustment can be done on a computer in
many systems.
Manufacturers have answered the call to make pediatric components lighter for the young
child. Excluding the socket and frame, all the electronics necessary for a child under 3 years of
age weigh 132 grams. Which means, the components weigh about the same as a standard cell
phone. When you add the socket and frame, the entire device should weigh between ½ -1 lb;
light enough that children even at 1 yr of age can handle quite well. In most cases, weight
should not be a concern for myoelectrics for young children. With these new components, there
is currently no study that shows a significant difference in the weight of this myoelectric that
contraindicates its recommendation for young children, even as young as 1 year old.
It is of extreme importance before making conclusions about the function of a child with
a prosthetic arm to evaluate the fit and ensure it has newer design principles with a flexible,
anatomically correct socket. Lighter weight components, improved socket material and design,
smaller electrodes, improved battery technology, and computerized adjustments have justified
the successful fittings and positive results of fitting children at a very young age with an upper
extremity prosthesis—even showing success with myoelectrics at one year of age. Coupled with
a complete education to parents, referrals, and payors, as well as a continuous follow up care,
children are maximizing their abilities with prosthetic devices.
|
|