Academy-Backed Research

Critically Appraised Topics (CATs)

Evidence-Based Practice Committee

Turn a Clinical Question into Evidence Your Colleagues Can Use

CATs close the gap between what's published and what happens at the bench. Each one answers a single clinical question, appraises the studies behind it, and says plainly how much confidence the evidence supports. 



Submit your CAT   Browse the Library

Where to Start:

Pick the path that best matches your goals

How a CAT comes together

Five steps from question to publication. Most authors work through them over several weeks.

  1. Define a focused clinical question

    Use PICO — Patient/Problem, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome. Check that the question is answerable with existing literature and matters at the bedside.

  2. Search and appraise the evidence

    Identify the best available research, then apply the appraisal criteria in the Author Instructions. Document your search strategy as you go — reviewers will look for it.

  3. Draft your CAT

    Follow the template: question, methods, key findings, clinical bottom line, limitations, and references.

  4. Peer review

    The Evidence-Based Practice Committee coordinates blinded review and returns either requested edits or an acceptance decision.

  5. Publish to the library

    Accepted CATs are formatted and added to the members-only library, where colleagues can find, use, and cite them.

What reviewers look for

Six things every accepted CAT does well. Use this as a self-check before you submit.

Focused and answerable

The question is framed with PICO and scoped to the literature that actually exists.

Transparent methods

Search strategy, databases, and inclusion criteria are documented clearly enough to repeat.

Critical appraisal

Study quality and risk of bias are assessed with standardized criteria, not summarized uncritically.

Actionable takeaway

Clinical implications are stated plainly, with benefits, risks, and limitations in view.

Professional style

Consistent formatting, accurate references, and a layout a busy clinician can scan.

Ethics and permissions

Copyright respected, conflicts disclosed, and no patient identifiers anywhere in the document.

Common questions

What is a Critically Appraised Topic?
A CAT is a concise, evidence-based summary that answers one focused clinical question in orthotics and prosthetics. It appraises the quality of the underlying studies and translates what they found into practical guidance — including where the evidence runs out.
Who can submit one?
Clinicians, residents, researchers, and educators. Student submissions are welcome when co-authored with a mentor.
What makes a strong CAT?
A well-defined question, rigorous appraisal, a clear synthesis, and a succinct clinical bottom line with limitations noted. The six standards above are the short version.
What if the evidence on my question is thin?
That is still worth reporting. A CAT that appraises limited evidence honestly — and says so — helps colleagues calibrate their expectations and points the field toward gaps worth studying. Overstating a weak finding is the only real failure mode here.
Where are the template and checklists?
Everything lives in the Where to start section above: the topic selection guide, the Author Instructions, and the Word template with structure, style, and reviewer criteria.
Who do I contact for help?
Email the Evidence-Based Practice Committee at ebpc@oandp.org with questions about topics, submissions, review, or library access.

Members-only

The Full CAT Library

Sign in to search, read, and download peer-reviewed CATs curated by the Academy. Not a member yet? Join today to unlock full access.

Trouble getting in? Email nlemons@oandp.org