For authors
Write a CAT
You have a question the literature can answer. Scope it, appraise the evidence, and write it up using the Academy template.
Submit your CATEvidence-Based Practice Committee
CATs close the gap between what's published and what happens at the bench. Each one answers a single clinical question, appraises the studies behind it, and says plainly how much confidence the evidence supports.
Submit your CAT Browse the Library

Pick the path that best matches your goals
For authors
You have a question the literature can answer. Scope it, appraise the evidence, and write it up using the Academy template.
Submit your CATFor reviewers
Clinicians, faculty, and researchers appraise submissions against a shared rubric and return edits or an acceptance decision.
Volunteer to reviewFor members
Search published CATs, cite them in practice and teaching, and share them with your team or residents.
Open the libraryFive steps from question to publication. Most authors work through them over several weeks.
Use PICO — Patient/Problem, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome. Check that the question is answerable with existing literature and matters at the bedside.
Identify the best available research, then apply the appraisal criteria in the Author Instructions. Document your search strategy as you go — reviewers will look for it.
Follow the template: question, methods, key findings, clinical bottom line, limitations, and references.
The Evidence-Based Practice Committee coordinates blinded review and returns either requested edits or an acceptance decision.
Accepted CATs are formatted and added to the members-only library, where colleagues can find, use, and cite them.
Six things every accepted CAT does well. Use this as a self-check before you submit.
The question is framed with PICO and scoped to the literature that actually exists.
Search strategy, databases, and inclusion criteria are documented clearly enough to repeat.
Study quality and risk of bias are assessed with standardized criteria, not summarized uncritically.
Clinical implications are stated plainly, with benefits, risks, and limitations in view.
Consistent formatting, accurate references, and a layout a busy clinician can scan.
Copyright respected, conflicts disclosed, and no patient identifiers anywhere in the document.
Members-only
Sign in to search, read, and download peer-reviewed CATs curated by the Academy. Not a member yet? Join today to unlock full access.
Trouble getting in? Email nlemons@oandp.org